A sourced comparison of Glean and Singular Innovation: what each one is, who each is built for, and what a smaller company should actually be comparing.
Glean and Singular Innovation solve different halves of the same problem, and the difference is scale. Glean describes itself as enterprise AI that understands your company, states that it was built for enterprise from day one, and publishes 275+ connectors to work applications, support for 40+ large language models, 3+ billion searches, 99.9%+ uptime and 93% enterprise adoption in under two years. It is a platform an organisation buys and rolls out, and it does not publish pricing anywhere on its site. Singular Innovation, founded in 2011 in St. Petersburg, Florida, works with US small and mid-market companies and does not sell a platform at all: it consolidates the systems a company already runs into a governed context layer, builds the AI workers that act on it, and hands over the roadmap, workflows, prompts, automations and code from day one, with a first working capability committed at 10 business days. For a company with an enterprise-scale knowledge estate and a team to run a rollout, Glean is the stronger answer and this page says so. For a company well below that scale, the useful comparison is not a cheaper Glean but whether the work gets built for you and left in your hands.
Compared as of August 2026.
Every cell in the Glean column links to the page on their own site where we read it.
Singular Innovation
A partner engagement. The consolidation and the AI workers on top of it are built for you and handed over.
Glean
A product platform an organisation buys, deploys and adopts, with agents teams can build themselves.
Source: glean.com
Singular Innovation
AI transformation for US small and mid-market companies: one operational workflow at a time.
Glean
The enterprise, stated explicitly and repeatedly, including enterprise scale, enterprise-grade security and enterprise adoption.
Source: glean.com
Singular Innovation
Not published. Scoped per engagement.
Glean
Not published. The pricing page carries no figures and routes to a demo request.
Source: glean.com
Singular Innovation
Built against the systems a client already runs, including Slack, HubSpot, QuickBooks, Airtable, CRMs, ERPs and Microsoft Teams.
Singular Innovation
Chosen per workflow as part of the build; the client owns the prompts and can change them.
Singular Innovation
First working capability in 10 business days; proof of concept in under 45 days.
Glean
Not published as a delivery commitment. Adoption is reported after the fact at 93% in under two years.
Source: glean.com
Singular Innovation
Client owns the roadmap, workflows, prompts, automations, interfaces, and code from day one.
Glean
Agents your teams build are yours, but they run on Glean. The platform is the thing you keep paying for.
Source: glean.com
Singular Innovation
30 verified reviews averaging 4.9 out of 5 on Clutch. Named client work with Burger King, Disney, Invercorp, Globales, and Osmo Wallet.
Singular Innovation
30 verified reviews averaging 4.9 out of 5 on Clutch.
Glean
Not linked from the homepage.
Every statement about another company on this page was read from that company's own public website in August 2026 and is linked to the page it came from. We do not publish claims about a competitor's pricing, headcount, or client results that the competitor does not publish itself. Where a firm does not publish something, this page says so rather than estimating it.
These are real situations, not a courtesy. If one of them describes you, talk to them rather than to us.
Choose Glean if you are an enterprise. They say it themselves, and it is not a hedge: built for enterprise from day one, with 275+ connectors and 99.9%+ uptime across core services. At that size the knowledge estate is the problem, and a platform designed for it will beat anything built one workflow at a time.
“built for enterprise from day one”
Source: glean.com
Choose Glean if the problem is genuinely search across a very large body of documents. They publish 3+ billion searches across documents and knowledge objects, which is a different order of problem from consolidating the handful of systems a fifty-person company runs.
Source: glean.com
Choose Glean if you want breadth of model choice as a platform feature. They publish support for 40+ large language models, which is more than any bespoke build would reasonably wire up.
“Unique LLMs”
Source: glean.com
Choose Glean if you have the team to run an adoption programme. Their published 93% adoption in under two years is a rollout outcome, and rollouts need owners. A company that cannot staff one will not get that number.
“Enterprise adoption in < 2 years”
Source: glean.com
Read from Glean's own website. We publish nothing about their pricing, headcount or client results that they do not publish themselves.
Glean describes itself as enterprise AI that understands your company.
“Enterprise AI that understands your company”
Source: glean.com
It states that it was built for the enterprise from the beginning rather than adapted to it.
“built for enterprise from day one”
Source: glean.com
Its stated purpose is turning company knowledge into action across one platform for every team.
“From knowledge to action. One platform for Enterprise AI.”
Source: glean.com
It publishes 275+ connectors to work applications and data sources, and support for 40+ distinct large language models.
“Connects to work apps and data sources”
Source: glean.com
It publishes operating scale: 3+ billion searches across documents and knowledge objects, and 99.9%+ uptime across core search and AI services.
Source: glean.com
It publishes an adoption figure of 93% enterprise adoption in under two years and 110 hours saved per user per year.
“Enterprise adoption in < 2 years”
Source: glean.com
Glean does not publish pricing. Its pricing page carries no per-user price, no seat minimum and no dollar figure, and directs visitors to request a demo.
Source: glean.com
Held to the same standard: every claim below is already published elsewhere on this site or on our public Clutch profile.
Singular Innovation is an AI transformation partner founded in 2011 and based in St. Petersburg, Florida. It maps a workflow that is costing a company time or margin, ships an AI-enabled system for it, and hands over ownership.
Source: singular-innovation.com
Engagements are built to reach a first working capability in 10 business days and a validated proof of concept in under 45 days.
“First working capability in 10 business days”
Source: singular-innovation.com
The client owns everything produced from day one: roadmaps, workflow design, prompts, automations, interfaces, and code.
“You own 100% from day one”
Source: singular-innovation.com
The approach is foundation-first. Context, permissions, and source-of-truth systems are connected before AI is asked to act on them.
“We connect context, permissions, and source-of-truth systems before asking AI to act.”
Source: singular-innovation.com
Published client work includes Burger King, Disney, Invercorp, Globales, and Osmo Wallet.
Source: singular-innovation.com
Singular holds 30 verified reviews at an average of 4.9 out of 5 on Clutch, and is a Vercel Solution Partner.
Source: clutch.co